Prediction of Rudolf Molleker [339th] vs Facundo Diaz Acosta [152nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W L L L
Form
W L W W L W L L L LHead To Head: Molleker 1 - 1 Acosta
They have played 4 sets in total, with Molleker winning 2 and Acosta winning 2. The last match between Molleker and Acosta was at the Canberra Challenger, 02-01-2024, First, Hard with Rudolf Molleker getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rudolf Molleker | 1 |
| Facundo Diaz Acosta | 1 |
| Molleker | Stats | Acosta |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (4-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 339 | Ranking | 152 |
| 146 | Highest Rank | 47 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 52% (239-218) | Career Total W/L | 60% (212-141) |
| $334,440 | Career Prize Money | $611,865 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats 
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
10 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Rudolf Molleker
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 21 | Games Won | 22 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:30:37 | Average Match Time | 1:30:37 |
| 60% (74/124) | 1st Serve % | 57% (78/138) |
| 80% (59/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (52/78) |
| 50% (25/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (37/60) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 36% (49/138) | Return Points Win % | 32% (40/124) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rudolf Molleker vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Molleker 1 - 1 Acosta
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Molleker has won 44.92% of points on their second serve, while Acosta has won 47.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Molleker, in recent form, has won 46.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Acosta has won 48.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.6% and 23.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Molleker has saved 51.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Acosta has saved 54.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Molleker has won 39.62% of matches played (W/L 21/ 32), with Acosta winning 32.14% (W/L 9/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Molleker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 172/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8). Acosta has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 184/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Molleker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 39.02% of matches (W/L 16/ 25), where as Acosta has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 38.89% of matches (W/L 7/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Molleker winning 1 times and Acosta being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Molleker winning 2 and Acosta winning 2. The last match between Molleker and Acosta was at the Canberra Challenger, 02-01-2024, First, Hard with Rudolf Molleker getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Molleker and Acosta have played a deciding set 0 times, with Molleker winning 0 times and Acosta 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Molleker winning 1, and Acosta 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Molleker has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.81 while Acosta has played against players with an average rank of 156.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Molleker has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Acosta has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Molleker has converted 31.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Acosta has converted 30.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Rudolf Molleker vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Best Odds For The Match
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Rudolf Molleker
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
24 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
73 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Rudolf Molleker
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
16 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Rudolf Molleker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Rudolf Molleker
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
34 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Finn Bass
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Rudolf Molleker
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
14
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Diaz Acosta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
34
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Zizou Bergs
60%
(
93 of
154)
1st Serve %
53%
(
86 of
161)
8
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
9
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
64 of
86)
51%
(
31 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
33%
(
51 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
57 of
161)
160
Total Points Won
155
|
6-7(5) 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Cameron Norrie
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
89%
(
50 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Ajeet Rai
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Molleker vs Acosta?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Molleker Vs Acosta is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (239/218) | Win/Loss | 60% (212/141) |
| 52% (554/514) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (482/339) |
| 51% (5192/5049) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4172/3619) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2233 | Aces Total | 920 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1368 | Total Double Faults | 1177 |
| 1:29:52 | Average Match Time | 1:47:54 |
| 271.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.03 |
| 60% (18578/31128) | 1st Serve % | 58% (13922/23943) |
| 70% (13041/18578) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9528/13922) |
| 50% (6312/12550) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5084/10021) |
| 44% (1144/2620) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1162/2650) |
| 38% (11438/30499) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10107/24100) |
| 53% (237/450) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (208/337) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 46% (69/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (52/108) |
| 51% (77/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (60/115) |
| 82% (244/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (222/184) |
| 18% (244/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (222/38) |
| 17% (213/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (130/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
